SRW: This week I’ll be chatting up author Edward Newton, whose
first horror novel, Horrorfrost, is a genuine sleeper. Physical, psychological
horror, and relentless dread, it’s the best of all dark fiction worlds and a
stunning debut.
Edward, welcome and tell everyone what your book’s about.
EN: Hell on
earth, but it turns out Hell’s a lot colder than we thought. A blizzard strikes a Montana ski resort and a
dangerous predator arrives with the whiteout.
A monster as big as a water tower begins to systematically dismantle
building by building, sending survivors out into the snowstorm. What will get them first—the frigid
temperatures or the massive beast that hunts them from behind the veil of
white?
SRW: I couldn’t find much information on you. Am I correct in
assuming this is your horror debut and your first novel?
EN: It’s my
first published novel. I’ve had several
short stories printed over the last few years.
I received the Robert L. Fish Memorial Award from the Mystery Writers of
America for the Best First Mystery Short Story for a tale published in Ellery
Queen Mystery Magazine, which was presented to me in New York City by none
other than Jeffery Deaver himself. Quite
an honor.
SRW: I did manage to suss out ("stalk") you live in Florida, about as far from the terrors
you write about in Horrorfrost as one could possibly get. You know an awful lot
about rough winters, so…did you experience some in your past? Hence Florida
now?
EN: I grew up
in North Dakota and spent decades battling the cold (no monsters out there in
the white, although my sisters would sometimes employ a sneak-attack snowball
fight). Last year, I finally waved the
“white” flag and escaped to central Florida, where I now meet folks who have
never experienced snow in their whole lives (which still boggles my mind).
SRW: Okay, the title, gotta ask you about the title. First of all
(and even though we’re used to pretty bad winters in the Midwest), I’ve never
heard the term “hoarfrost” until your book. Actually, I kinda thought it
sounded like a special for prostitutes at the hair salon. Was the title
originally Horrorfrost (which is a great and fitting title) or did it start out
as something else?
EN: Ha! The
title came on pretty early. I like the
terms that are uniquely familiar to folks that really know what cold is, like
wind chill, block heater, ice fishing...there was a kid down here in Florida
just fascinated when my father-in-law described the experience of fishing on a
frozen lake!
SRW: Your writing is extremely adept, assured, and very good. Having
said that, I gotta admit I don’t like the trendy present tense writing that all
of the cool kids are doing these days. To me, it reads like stage directions (“He
walks down the stairs, looks in a mirror, and combs his hair.”). But in your
book, it works. It adds urgency to the proceedings. Do you always write in
present tense or do you mix it up for every project?
EN: I rarely
write in present tense. It made sense
for this story as I tried to frame the veil of white as a symbol of the
unknowability of the future. Many of my
characters are stuck in the present and afraid of the future, fearful of what
is coming next in their lives. They
can’t imagine what their tomorrow is going to be. So the present tense was meant to evoke more
the mood of being stuck in the now instead of stuck in the snow.
SRW: The prose is quite cinematic, yet there are more
psychological inner monologues than dialogue (which I would imagine would be
hell on a movie adaptation). Are books or cinema a larger influence?
EN: I usually
prefer my horror in book form. King
novels are the best; King movies are hit and miss. Visual horror is very different for me than
physiological horror. In Horrorfrost,
I meant to make it as much about the fear of what was coming next in the lives
in these characters before the novel even began as the fear of whatever monster
suddenly arrived to hunt them in the snow.
That kind of fear seems suited for the page. Not that a big, bad monster in a crazy
blizzard wouldn’t be pretty great to see on the big screen!
SRW: The beginning of the book reminded me of all of those cheesy
‘70’s Irwin Allen disaster movies (hey, in a good way!), where you’re setting
up all of the characters with soap opera problems and clichés (there’s a
selfish lothario cheating on his fiancé, an overweight bullied kid, a woman
afraid of facing her impending aging, etc.), than unleashing them into Hell to
see who will survive. But what was refreshing is you’ve lent a modern relevant
eye to the proceedings and have switched the stock characters up to all kinds
of different races, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Was this intentional?
Or did the characters just sorta fit the plot?
EN: I wanted a
broad representation in the cast. I’m
tired of seeing the same blonde bimbo chased by the same psychotic white
hillbilly. I thought it was interesting
to see a more representative slice of America cast in a classic kind of
horror-movie setup.
SRW: Frankly, you surprised me quite a bit in who and who didn’t
survive, avoiding yet more clichés. Bonus! Did you have a clear idea who would
make it out alive or did the characters survive independently, surprising you
as well? (I love when that happens in my books.)
EN: I
intentionally set out at the beginning with the idea that I had no clue as to
who would make it to the end. I almost
made a target with the names of the cast and just threw darts at the board as
to who might live or die. I wanted the
randomness of a crazy situation to play out in the cast. In the end, I wrote the story and the ones
who lived and died became a mix of karma and fate and chance—just like life
itself. I was surprised myself by some
of those that survived... and a couple that didn’t.
SRW: Roman’s a very interesting character. A successful corporate
raider, he walked out on his job twenty years ago to go wrestle, kill, and skin
bears, because he’s sick and tired of people and progress. Is he your
mouthpiece? Are you a grumpy hermit (a lot of writers are, including me). Do
you agree with his assessment that modern “civilization” is awful, addicted to
their phones, slandering via social media instead of communicating
face-to-face, and worshipping sub-par celebrity behavior?
EN: Maybe Roman
has the right idea! He refuses to
embrace the future and he can’t go back to the past. He is stuck in the present. That’s what I struggle with...do you stay in
one place or do you move forward, into the unknown, pressing through the white
even if it is dangerous and crazy and doesn’t make any damn sense? I identify with Roman (and a lot of the other
characters) in that I’m also leery of tomorrow.
I’m afraid of what’s in store for us.
Do I agree? Maybe the ending of
the novel is a bit of the answer.
SRW: Would you rather read/write about visual horrors, utilizing
vivid imagination, or leave said horrors unseen up to the readers’ imagination? I’m curious as to your
answers as both a reader and a writer.
EN: Interesting
question, because my first draft was intentionally vague about the nature of
the monster and the origins of the storm.
The publishers wanted it more defined.
In the end, I was pleased by the explanation as it tied the theme of
“fear of the future” to the unseen threat inside the blizzard a little more
overtly. I think a visual versus unseen
threat depends on the nature of the horror and the purpose of the story. Here, I was more descriptive about setting
and character reaction than the actual action and the look of the creature. I think it’s more mysterious here to have the
monster veiled by the blizzard than wholly described.
SRW: The book details a long, intense run for survival. It’s very
suspenseful and there’s a wonderfully claustrophobic sense of dread building
and propelling the characters to their fate. As an experiment (and based on a dream)
I tried writing a book that’s basically one long chase scene. I know how hard
it is to write constant compelling suspense. Do you find that aspect of writing
tough? If not, what’s the rockiest road in writing for you?
EN: It wasn’t
easy when the storyline was constantly trying to freeze up all my main
characters! I think the format here
helped me be able to sustain forward momentum.
The characters might have had misgivings about the future, but the
storyline gave them no choice but to move, move, move. They couldn’t stay in one spot or they’d end
up icicles. The setting didn’t let for
much pause, either, as the only way to stay warm is to keep moving. The blizzard necessitated a brisk pace.
SRW: Edward, I started counting how many times you wrote the word
“white” and gave up after about a billion. Did you ever consider using
synonyms? Although, honestly, I can’t imagine such sentences as “He floundered
through the alabaster storm.”
EN: White was
my synonym - it substituted for “darkness”, “shadows”, “the unknown”,
“tomorrow”, all the things in front of us that we can’t see or refuse to
acknowledge. I love a thesaurus now and
again, but the simplicity of the word “white” was most effective. I tried the flowery route in an earlier draft
and it just distracted from the flow. In
the end, I really like that the repeat of white was just like the effect on the
characters - endless, everywhere, an onslaught.
SRW: What’s next on your laptop?
EN: Oh, where
to start! I’ve got a murder mystery and
a couple of Young Adult novels I’d love to see in print. I just finished an edited draft of a
political thriller that examines our divided discourse in America. Speaking of politics, check out my alternate
account of the 2016 election called American Herstory, a fast-paced
thriller available on Amazon. And the
itch for another horror novel is starting to pester. The voices in my head always have something
new to say...
SRW: Alright, there you go! Thanks for being a good sport,
Edward, and everyone go snag a copy of Horrorfrost, put out by the fine folks
at Grinning Skull Press. It’s a good one, guaranteed! Perfect remedy for these
quarantined days.
Great interview!
ReplyDelete