Huzzah! Betcha didn't know about this holiday, right? Well, get out your party hats and your banana hammocks, 'cause it's here! (Firework explosions!)
That's right, folks. Celebrate Sunday, September 4th, the way you know you want to...with two comic (kind of cozy) mysteries featuring my characters, Zach and Zora.
You met them yet? Zach is a bone-headed male stripper (sorry..."male entertainment dancer") who has a good heart but nothing going on upstairs. Zora, his very irritable, very pregnant (and ex-sleuth) sister got all the brains. Often, she rides to her beloved (why, dear God, why?) brother's defense when he keeps stumbling across dead bodies. Oh, and she usually has her full entourage of kids along for the ride. Until things get dangerous. It's complicated (you know, like the kids say on Facebook).
The first book, Bad Day in a Banana Hammock, is on sale Sunday, the 4th for the introductory price of .99! As my mom would say, "highway robbery!" (For me, of course). One click away from larfs and suspense: Bad Day in a Banana Hammock
The follow-up, Murder by Massage, releases Sunday, the 4th! Double whammy, pow, pow! (Some of Zach's "dancing" terminology). Get it here: Murder by Massage
In the second book, you'll meet a dancing detective, a jail-cell full of thugs who Zach tries to teach how to dance, "Furries (I know, right?)," ex-hippies, ex-radical revolutionists, murderers and their victims. There's a g-string clad chase through the streets of Kansas City that will have you on the edge of your (banana) hammock!
The first book was written on a dare! Little did I realize I'd be doing my second one now, let alone an entire series. I have no shame!
Join in on the fun already! EVERYONE will be talking about them around the water coolers come next week. (Do they still have water coolers?)
Bad Day in a Banana Hammock
Murder by Massage
Psst...whaddaya expect from a guy who looks like this?
Sunday, September 4, 2016
Friday, September 2, 2016
Olympics Sofa Judges
It's funny how after just ten minutes into watching the Olympics, my wife and I settle into our comfy at-home sofa judging routine. Like we're experts or something.
"You see that? She planted it! Rock-solid!"
"Ohhhhh, too bad. One foot out-of-bounds and a small hop on that last landing!"
Easy for us to judge as we sit in the comfort of home. Giving our fingers a real workout on the remote and hoisting beverages in wrist curls.
And we know it all, too!
"Ooooooh! A triple Sow-Cow!"
For the life of me, I have no idea what a "Sow-Cow" is. Pretty sure I botched the spelling there, too. But it's fun to bandy about like the announcers do.
"Gah. Can't believe it. The men's gymnastics team really botched it! They were terrible!"
Well, No, they weren't "terrible." Far from it. Just a sliver shy of excellent maybe. (But, really guys, you gotta quit "cupping." It's dumb. What's next? Bloodletting by leeches?) But that's what happens when you give people the freedom to judge at home. Kinda like how trolls feel protected by their (relative) internet obscurity. But without the nastiness and people getting their feelings hurt. Now would I ever tell the men's gymnastic team they were terrible to their faces? Hell, no! You see the muscles on those guys?
I mean, we all love the girls Olympics team, right? 'Cause they medaled like crazy and all that. And 'cause they're a cute bunch of little giggly girls. But there's no way I'd ever insult one of them. Any one of these "little girls" could beat the tar out of me. Using only their feet. Thank goodness there's no need to insult them. Even from the safety of my sofa.
Gotta get back to the closing ceremony now. Still a little more sofa critiquing to be done.
"You see that? She planted it! Rock-solid!"
"Ohhhhh, too bad. One foot out-of-bounds and a small hop on that last landing!"
Easy for us to judge as we sit in the comfort of home. Giving our fingers a real workout on the remote and hoisting beverages in wrist curls.
And we know it all, too!
"Ooooooh! A triple Sow-Cow!"
For the life of me, I have no idea what a "Sow-Cow" is. Pretty sure I botched the spelling there, too. But it's fun to bandy about like the announcers do.
"Gah. Can't believe it. The men's gymnastics team really botched it! They were terrible!"
Well, No, they weren't "terrible." Far from it. Just a sliver shy of excellent maybe. (But, really guys, you gotta quit "cupping." It's dumb. What's next? Bloodletting by leeches?) But that's what happens when you give people the freedom to judge at home. Kinda like how trolls feel protected by their (relative) internet obscurity. But without the nastiness and people getting their feelings hurt. Now would I ever tell the men's gymnastic team they were terrible to their faces? Hell, no! You see the muscles on those guys?
I mean, we all love the girls Olympics team, right? 'Cause they medaled like crazy and all that. And 'cause they're a cute bunch of little giggly girls. But there's no way I'd ever insult one of them. Any one of these "little girls" could beat the tar out of me. Using only their feet. Thank goodness there's no need to insult them. Even from the safety of my sofa.
Gotta get back to the closing ceremony now. Still a little more sofa critiquing to be done.
Friday, August 26, 2016
Janet Lane-Walters: Paging Nurse "Good-Writer!"
Janet Lane-Walters writes in many genres including fantasy
and romance. Recently I had the pleasure of reading her medical suspense
thriller, Code Blue, a page turner if there ever was one. She’s graciously
agreed to answer some of my silly questions.
SRW: Welcome, Janet! You’ve been a very busy writer! I
understand Code Blue isn’t representative of the usual fare you right. Tell the
readers more about the books you publish.
JLW:
Actually Code Blue is the only suspense I've ever written. While it
does involve nurses, doctors and hospitals the romance is downplayed. I
also write a lot of paranormal stories. Some of the paranormal are
considered time-travel but they're really more reincarnation or
alternate world. When I sit down to begin a story, I generally know the
sub-genre before I begin and my mind slips into that sort of world.
SRW: Please let everyone know a little bit about Code Blue.
JLW:Code
Blue is a medical suspense. I like to read this kind of books but the
doctors and nurses are always the evil ones. I wanted to try something
different and wondered "What if someone was killing the doctors and
nurses?" That was how the story began. I was lucky to have an
acquaintance who was a forensic psychiatrist and I picked his brain to
help develop the killer. The heroine has recently suffered a life
changing situation when her controlling husband died. She's finding her
way. Planting clues was fun, especially the gifts she receives. Who
would suspect candy, books and flowers of being sinister?
SRW: I’ve read that you used to be a nurse. It certainly
shows in Code Blue, very authentic. Either that or you’re a glutton for
research. So, how much of the tale is autobiographical (excluding the murders,
of course. I hope!)?
JLW:
I'm a nurse, yes and I worked on an orthopedic floor for several years.
I did use the construction of that unit in the book. No murders,
though.
SRW: The book is a constantly P.O.V. shifting tale, a method
I like to use. And it fits the tale very well. Is this your usual writing
style? Or do you change it up with different books?
JLW: Point of view for this book was
different from my usual tale telling. I call this the book of
diminishing characters. There are two ways to keep the suspense rolling,
one is to do a first person. This wasn't a book for that. The multiple
character viewpoints allowed the suspense to build. My books usually
have three or maybe four viewpoints, except my YA fantasies and they are
multiple. For romance hero, heroine and perhaps villain usually works
best.
SRW: I know writers work in different ways. For you, what
comes first? Setting, characters, plot? Just an incident you imagine?
JLW: Now this is an interesting
question. I'd say none of the above. My stories usually come when I'm
bored and can't fall asleep. Then I start telling myself a story. This
probably means the plot sort of comes first and there have to be
characters. Settings, never. I have trouble remembering not to have my
characters exist in a bubble. Actually the stories just sort of appear.
SRW: One fascinating aspect of Code Blue is how you delve
into the psychotic mind of the killer, inviting the reader inside his head for
how he views things. I believe your husband is a psychiatrist (psychologist? I
never can keep the two straight.). Did you run the “watcher’s” segments by him
for input?
JLW: Actually other than talking to a
forensic psychiatrist. the story evolved from my twisted mind. My
husband is a psychiatrist and has only ever read one of my books and
that was because he'd had major surgery and had nothing else to read. My
critique group did a lot of the feedback on the story.
SRW: There’re a whole lotta affairs and shenanigans going on
at your fictional hospital, particularly between the nurses and the caddish
doctors. Is it fair to say this happens a lot? Scoop, Janet, scoop like the
wind!
JLW: Of course there are. Nurses and
doctors are people who work under stressful situations. As to whether
it happens a lot, if I told you... I've known of a few situations but
none like the ones I brought up in my book. I just have a vivid
imagination.
SRW: One of the hardest things for me to write is action
scenes. Maybe love scenes. You handle both well. Is there anything in
particular you struggle with?
JLW:
Love writing action scenes and when I began the biggest love scenes
were holding hands and a kiss at the end of the story. Learning to write
love scenes was a challenge and I have a lot of books on the subject.
What I still struggle with is what an editor pointed out when I first
began writing. "Your characters exist in a vacuum." So I have an entire
draft devoted to getting the setting in place.
SRW: Okay, I found your protagonist, Susan, alternately strong,
admirable and frustrating! This is coming from a guy’s perspective, but her
insistence on keeping her neighbor/pal Patrick at arm’s length due to a fear of
having her independence snatched away by him drove me nuts. Not all guys do
this (even though her late husband apparently did). As a male reader, I call
foul, Susan! Defend yourself!
JLW: Susan is a character so she
can't defend herself. I needed her to be fearful of Patrick's wanting to
control her. He was her husband's best friend. If she hadn't felt this
way, she would have confided in him earlier and there wouldn't have been
a story, at least not a suspenseful one. Also, If Patrick didn't have
to fight to gain her trust there would be no romance story either.
Characters need to be tailored for the story you're telling. I've never
had a character take over a story, Whether that's good or bad, I don't
know.
SRW: While reading the book, I couldn’t quite put my finger
on what year it takes place. As the interview detective I am, I looked into it.
I see that you published it in 2012. Yet in the book there are no cell phones
and the nurses aren’t fully up and computer functional. This leads me to one of
two beliefs: either it was written much earlier; or you (like myself) find that
cell phones and modern technology sometimes get in the way of writing
thrillers.
JLW: This story was originally
published in 1998. When the publisher returned my rights, I didn't want
to change and put in modern things like cell phones. There weren't
computers in the hospitals back then either. They're a very recent entry
into the health field. If I were to revise and re-write, I would put
those things in and it's easy to write scenes where something happens to
the cell phone, either a smart of a dumb one. Forget to recharge. In a
chase scene have it dropped and no time to pick it up.
SRW: Tell everyone what’s up next on Janet’s keyboard.
JLW: Working on The Cancer Capricorn
Connection - a nurse doctor romance. Only have the rough draft done so
time will pass before it appears. Also revising a Rights Back book now
titled Past Betrayals Past Loves. Reincarnation novel.
SRW: Thanks very much for stopping by, Janet! You can check
out Janet and her books at:
Friday, August 19, 2016
Pokeman NO!
I'll let you in on a little secret...I was sick of Pokemon 20 years ago. Honestly, I'd thought it'd crested the wave of popularity. But it's come screaming back with a vengeance, that damn Pikachu popping up everywhere you look.
You see, 20 years ago, my young daughter was into the cartoon when it first hit the airwaves. So, dutifully, I suffered through every episode with her. We graduated to trading cards, manga, expensive plush toys imported from Japan. It got to the point where I could practically name the first 100 of the little b@$*ards myself. Gave me nightmares. I mean...Jigglypuff? A round, pink big-eyed monstrosity that lulled everyone to sleep with its demonic siren song. But...that's what parents do: suffer for their children.
So I thought I'd seen the last of the little yellow, horned devil. Even had an impromptu (yet cathartic and fun!) funeral for one of the Pikachu plushies while recently cleaning out the basement. How I tortured that toy made me kinda wonder about myself.
Anyway, I digress. Now Pokemon mania has swept the nation like a plague. This time affecting adults and children alike. Everywhere you go, cars are crashing, people are fighting , Pokemon victims stumble into wells and stroll into busy traffic. Total anarchy in the streets! Why? Because the Pokemon are on the loose. Gotta catch them all! Gah! The game, "Pokemon Go," is unavoidable. And here I thought people "inviting" me to play Candy Crush (whatever that is) were annoying.
Now, as in every hot topic issue, not all sides are clear. Given that I'm fair-minded, let's look at the positives. Some doctors ("experts" as they're referred to) say "Pokemon Go" is a good thing. It's getting people outside and walking. I'm all for that. But look up from your smart phone every once in a while!
And let's give the conspiracy guys their due diligence. They're saying "Pokemon Go" is a Government Spook. They may not be wrong. Not only are players allowing access to their location and camera, but possibly even their Google account. Scary that the game was created by Niantic, a company founded by John Hanke. According to my research (and, as always, I believe everything I read on the internet), if you trace Hanke's work career, he's heavily involved in Government-funded capital firms and security organizations. Whew.
And according to my research assistant, Mr. Google, the following is buried in "Pokemon Go's" privacy policy:
We may disclose any information about you (or your authorized child) that is in our possession or control to government or law enforcement officials or private parties.
Big Brother is here! And he looks like Squirtle!
Enough is enough! It's time to take back the streets! People! Pokemon aren't real! Pursue something worthwhile, like, I dunno, snipes or Bigfoot or something!
(Psst...don't tell anyone but I'm kinda jealous. After watching my bro-in-law play "Pokemon Go" this weekend, I thought the game looked kinda fun. But Luddite that I am, I only have a flip-phone, circa 2001. Probably a good thing. I'd get addicted, I just know it! Gotta catch 'em all!).
You see, 20 years ago, my young daughter was into the cartoon when it first hit the airwaves. So, dutifully, I suffered through every episode with her. We graduated to trading cards, manga, expensive plush toys imported from Japan. It got to the point where I could practically name the first 100 of the little b@$*ards myself. Gave me nightmares. I mean...Jigglypuff? A round, pink big-eyed monstrosity that lulled everyone to sleep with its demonic siren song. But...that's what parents do: suffer for their children.
So I thought I'd seen the last of the little yellow, horned devil. Even had an impromptu (yet cathartic and fun!) funeral for one of the Pikachu plushies while recently cleaning out the basement. How I tortured that toy made me kinda wonder about myself.
Anyway, I digress. Now Pokemon mania has swept the nation like a plague. This time affecting adults and children alike. Everywhere you go, cars are crashing, people are fighting , Pokemon victims stumble into wells and stroll into busy traffic. Total anarchy in the streets! Why? Because the Pokemon are on the loose. Gotta catch them all! Gah! The game, "Pokemon Go," is unavoidable. And here I thought people "inviting" me to play Candy Crush (whatever that is) were annoying.
Now, as in every hot topic issue, not all sides are clear. Given that I'm fair-minded, let's look at the positives. Some doctors ("experts" as they're referred to) say "Pokemon Go" is a good thing. It's getting people outside and walking. I'm all for that. But look up from your smart phone every once in a while!
And let's give the conspiracy guys their due diligence. They're saying "Pokemon Go" is a Government Spook. They may not be wrong. Not only are players allowing access to their location and camera, but possibly even their Google account. Scary that the game was created by Niantic, a company founded by John Hanke. According to my research (and, as always, I believe everything I read on the internet), if you trace Hanke's work career, he's heavily involved in Government-funded capital firms and security organizations. Whew.
And according to my research assistant, Mr. Google, the following is buried in "Pokemon Go's" privacy policy:
We may disclose any information about you (or your authorized child) that is in our possession or control to government or law enforcement officials or private parties.
Big Brother is here! And he looks like Squirtle!
Enough is enough! It's time to take back the streets! People! Pokemon aren't real! Pursue something worthwhile, like, I dunno, snipes or Bigfoot or something!
(Psst...don't tell anyone but I'm kinda jealous. After watching my bro-in-law play "Pokemon Go" this weekend, I thought the game looked kinda fun. But Luddite that I am, I only have a flip-phone, circa 2001. Probably a good thing. I'd get addicted, I just know it! Gotta catch 'em all!).
Friday, August 12, 2016
M.J. LaBeff: the girl next door with a dark side
SRW: Today I’m yakking to new author, M.J. LaBeff, whose
recently released romantic suspenser, Mind
Games, is a fascinating page turner.
Without further ado, here’s M.J! How ‘bout you start with a
brief synopsis of Mind Games?
MJ: Hi Stuart! Thanks for hosting me on your awesome blog I’m
happy I kept you up all night and turning pages! That’s payback. Your novel
Godland grabbed me by the throat and wouldn’t let me go. My eyes were on fire
but I couldn’t stop reading. Oops, I’m going to give a synopsis of your book.
I’ve nearly forgotten mine.
I think that about sums it up without giving too much away.
MJ: Thanks, Stuart, I’m happy to hear my dark side met your
expectations! We both write rather twisty tales.
Uh, oh, I have to admit- flies have been harmed. Yep, I’m
actually the girl who will squash a fly (I detest those germ flying, noise
making creatures). It is the one bug who can find its way into my house and
make me mad. I actually broke a blind I was so determined to smack a fly dead
with my flip flop. It’s nasty business squashing a fly. Fortunately, we don’t
have many flies in southern Arizona. And I don’t pull off their wings; that’s
just not right. I will rescue a cricket, spider, Beatle bug and call the fire
department to remove a rattlesnake. We do have rattlers in the desert. You’re
really gonna give me a hard time over these dead flies. Come on now, I have
three dogs and let me just say they’re spoiled! I adore animals including some pesky
bugs. Geesh.
Now, I should explain that my family and friends find me and
my writing in complete juxtaposition. I think if you ask people who know me,
they’d say I’m kind, thoughtful, honest and generous and in the same breath
would say, they read my book and I scared them. Sorry, not sorry.
The dark side of my writing comes from years of reading
mystery/suspense/thriller novels, a fascination with the paranormal, and my own
scary dreams. I have a recurring dream where I’m always being chased and
running breathlessly from a maniac but then there’s always some new element of
terror. Dreams are great seeds for me to start a story. A scene in Mind Games
was from a dream. That dream was the beginning of a full length novel.
I still remember standing in Barnes and Noble and telling my
friend about the dream. A woman in the aisle near us overheard the
conversation. How was I to know she was eavesdropping? I’ll never forget the
look on her face and wide eyes as she slowly moved away. My friend was certain
the woman was going to call the police, considering my dramatic retelling of
the dream. I couldn’t blame her. That’s when I knew I was really onto
something.
SRW: Um, about those flies...(I, too, am a world-class, furniture devastating fly hunter). Do you ever see yourself not writing in the dark arena?
MJ: No. Gotta say sorry to my mom, she would luuuuv for me to
write a contemporary sweet romance. Poor woman, the suspense/thriller series I
have coming out has her a bit concerned.
Oh, well, at least I’ve made my dad proud. Ha! If anything I see myself
gravitating more strongly to suspense, thrillers and possibly even horror. The
most difficult scenes for me to write in Mind Games were the romance ones. My
hat’s off to romance writers everywhere- it’s difficult to craft.
They say “write what you know”- I suspect the “they” are
other writers and I have to agree. I love reading a book that keeps me on the
edge of my seat, breathless and turning pages. Your novel Godland was
exceptional. As much as I tried to savor the story I wanted to devour it. Page
turners are the best. Godland is a page turner. Always my goal, always
something I’m working on especially with my suspense/thriller series the Last
Cold Case.
SRW: Okay, in Mind
Games, I have to be honest with you, M.J., I was a little concerned for the
first part of the book as we have all sorts of disparate things happening:
out-of-body experiences, ghostly visitations, death (or is it Murrrrrderrrrr?)
by suicide, a new romance, teen runaways, a missing sibling, a potentially
dangerous relative and other things. I wondered if you were going to be able to
pull them together. But you did! Do you enjoy leading the reader down a
seriously W.T.H. road?
MJ: Thank you so much! I like to keep the plot turning but want
to keep it simple enough so that a reader can remember all of the details.
W.T.H. road is my favorite one to drive- dangerous curves,
dips, hazard signs proclaiming eminent danger if you don’t slow down. Buckle up
I’m taking you on a thrill ride. I mean read.
Oh, yeah, I hope to keep a reader guessing and reading. I’m
happy you enjoyed the various storylines and collision course to the end. I
enjoy writing secondary characters with shady pasts and shrouded in suspicion
that’s where the multiple story threads emerge. Sometimes I’ll think a certain
character is the villain and then as the story continues to emerge I learn I
had the wrong guy or gal. I think that lends to leading a reader in different
directions. Somehow, it works and I don’t have to do much if any rewriting. The
writing process is strange and different for all of us.
SRW: Sparrow’s an alternately frustrating and admirable heroine.
Being a guy, I suppose, is why I get frustrated with her in her
on-again/off-again dealings with Derrick. (I also realize it’s a staple any
time romance is part of the genre; happy relationships no one wants to read
about). But then Sparrow is also capable of great courage. Still, at times, I
wanted to shake her. Defend Sparrow, Counselor LaBeff!
MJ: All right then, ladies and gentleman of the jury…
I had intentionally named the main character Sparrow hoping
readers would equate the name with a fledgling bird just pushed out of the
nest. Initially she’s frightened by the visions, then delves deeper into their
meaning. Eventually, she faces challenges head on, pushes forward and finally
resigns herself to the harsh truth.
Again, the romance angle was difficult for me. I tried to
imagine what she was going through- the bad relationship she’d come out of and
how she would long for Derrick but have to get over her fear of trusting him.
Plus, she’s dealing with potential evidence involving her father. I kept
thinking her gut reaction would be to defend him, to attack Derrick, and then
slowly come around to reality. Yes, she pulls Derrick close then pushes him
away. It’s her initially knowing this man is going after her father intent on
sealing his fate. It’s not until cold hard facts hit her upside the head does
she snap out of the denial and fully commit to Derrick and expose the truth
about the deaths.
SRW: So…yoga. There’s a great deal of talk about yoga in the
tale. My wife takes yoga classes (she even made me go to a meditation class
with her; alas, I’ve forgotten everything). I assume you do as well. Did your
research start and stop with your own experiences? Or did you go beyond the
call of duty and research, research, research (and by that, I mean calling upon
the Great God Google)?
MJ: Let’s Ooooommmmm, and that’s about all I've got.
The research started with me and ended with a book on both subjects.
I had taken Pilates twice a week years ago and it was a great compliment to
weight training and cardio. Then my favorite Pilates teacher left the gym and
despite every effort to replace her, the class ceased. That’s when I thought
I’d give yoga a try. It’s an amazing form of exercise that takes skill,
technique and patience. I gave those basic yoga classes my best shot. It was
difficult. The breathing exercises weren’t easy for me. I felt quite dizzy!
However, I was determined and purchased a book with basic and intermediate
poses and meditation exercises and practiced in the privacy of my own home. It
really helped me to better understand how to position Sparrow’s body and how
meditation could transcend her mind. I think we all have the ability to unlock
our subconscious or recall information from our past. Sadly, I never stuck with
the yoga or meditation.
SRW: The book raises some ethical issues regarding how far a
professional physician should take matters. Do the ends justify the means? Was
this at the forefront of your mind while writing?
MJ: I’m sure it was in my subconscious. We have such a huge prescription
pain pill addiction in this country. It’s not necessarily the doctors over
prescribing. I think the dangers of pain pills weren’t really known and now
we’re all becoming better educated as patients and doctors. With this thought in mind I’m sure it helped
spin the story, but it wasn’t the driving force behind the book. Truth- Dr.
Phil inspired me with an idea.
The character, Dr. Theodore Von Langley came from playing
the “What if…” game. You know the one. It’s a common technique all authors employ.
What if a doctor with national recognition and a platform went too far? The
person I had been thinking of was Dr. Phil. I’m sorry to drag Dr. Phil into the
discussion but I catch his TV show occasionally, and I couldn’t help but think…
“What if…”
A reader who had written a review really captured this idea.
She wrote, “What happens when those trusted with the well-being of others are a
danger to themselves?”
You’ve posed a difficult question. Do the ends justify the means? I think doctors have difficult
decisions to make when it comes to saving lives. I’d like to believe all
doctors run ethical practices and have a strong moral compass guiding them to
make choices that are responsible and in our best interests.
Again, “What if…” a medical professional believed so much in
the research being conducted and potential outcome that things went too far and
once that line is crossed…
SRW: I thoroughly enjoyed the alternating P.O.V. between
Sparrow and Derrick. As you know, it’s how I like to write, too. I always think
more than one character’s P.O.V. is more interesting. Simple mathematics! Had
you decided at the onset to write it this way? Or did it come naturally once
you started? Planner or pantser?
MJ: I always write in third person with alternating points of
view. That’s probably from reading a lot books written that way versus first
person P.O.V. which I think is very hard to write. I agree that allowing the
reader insight into each character makes a more riveting read. I have much
admiration for writers who can write deep P.O.V. Let’s not get into all of that
or this point of view stuff. It’s tricky business. Let me move onto plotting
and flying by the seat of my pants. This is the fun stuff.
I’m part planner and pantser. I always say I know the
beginning, middle and end. I plot some, take notes along the way, jot down
scenes, but mostly the story is in my head or stuck deep inside it and once I
start typing information seems to emerge. I write in what I call a linear
manner. I can’t skip ahead or write future scenes whereas I’ve heard other
authors can write chapters out of order from following a plot outline. That’s
just way too much planning for me. The story would never come out the right
way.
SRW: Although I’m not a romance fan (yucky stuff! Ew! Kissing!),
I have to say your two chapter “sex scene” was well written and tastefully
done. But for me, it did somewhat slow down the pacing of the tale. I
wanted them to wrap it up already and get back to the mystery at hand! But I
know readers enjoy these private peeks. Am I alone here? (I guess one of these
days I’ll have to take the time-out to write a sex scene; um, one not ambushed
by a demon or something along these lines).
MJ: Yikes, I’m glad you survived Sparrow and Derrick’s first
kiss and that punch of romance near the end. Oh, come on now, you don’t like a
happily ever after? Just kidding, I
really get where you’re coming from here.
Often when I’m reading romantic suspense I’ll rush through
the love scenes because I want to get back to the suspense. I had a difficult
time deciding on whether or not to keep those scenes. They weren’t easy to
write. You know how it is when you go through the editing process to cut or not
to cut, to rewrite or not to rewrite. I consider it all part of my author
growth. Some of my friends read the book and had the same reaction as you, and
I’m actually happy to have learned I craft a much better thriller than love
story!
Stuart, if you give the romance genre a try let me know.
I’ll beta-read, I might be able to help cut the demon from the scene, but
that’s a big might. I get caught up in the suspense, too. Honestly, my crit partner writes sweet
contemporary romance for Harlequin, and it’s funny to me that I’m useful to
her. I’m here for ya if you need me to read.
SRW: You’d told me you have a planned trilogy. Does this
mean more Sparrow (and Derrick) mysteries? Will her (slightly) supernatural
powers play a part in them?
MJ: Sparrow’s and Derrick’s story has been told. It is a single
title stand alone, and I have no intention of writing any future books with
these two characters. I had always viewed Sparrow’s supernatural gift as part
of her uncovering her past but that once she’d resolved things the visions
would end.
The Last Cold Case series is a four book suspense/thriller series
so far and will be released with Muse It Up Publishing. The first book, Last
Summer’s Evil comes out this fall/winter. The second book, Last Fall’s Hunted
releases spring 2017 and the third book, Last Winter’s Taken releases fall 2017.
The fourth book, Last Spring’s Stranger comes out spring 2018.
I can’t wait for readers to meet homicide detective Rachel
Hood and FBI agent Nick Draven and the diabolic serial killer, the Summertime
Slayer in Last Summer’s Evil.
I’ll have updates on my website mjlabeff.com and in monthly
newsletter. There’s a nifty signup form for the newsletter on the website.
SRW: Besides the series, what else are you planning?
MJ: I have an idea for a fifth book in the Last Cold Case series,
but I’m not sure if I’ll move forward with these stories or not. I hope readers
fall in love with homicide detective Rachel Hood and FBI agent Nick Draven and
want to read more books featuring them tracking a new nemesis.
I’m a big fan of suspense/thriller novels and will continue
writing in those genres.
I also have another single title stand alone novel written
that I haven’t submitted to my publisher yet. Currently, it falls in the
paranormal genre… perhaps with some rewriting I’ll turn it into my first
horror!
You’re welcome. This has been fun!
SRW: Thanks for being a good sport, M.J! Folks, go pick her
book up. It can be found here:
Friday, August 5, 2016
When Ribs Go Bad...
So my wife was in the kitchen, ponderously staring at the third slab of ribs we hadn't devoured. She said, "they smell funny."
I thought "funny" how? I took a whiff. Big, beefy, bouncy & meaty. A little strong, sure, but hey, my olfactory senses aren't the best. Smelled like a dead cow. (Um, probably a little too much).
She says, "I'm not going to eat this." I say, "that's ridiculous, we're not gonna waste the meat." To back up my statement, I corralled a jury composed of my daughter, her boyfriend, my niece and nephew. All took turns sniffing it, one after the other. Consensus was it smelled fine. My daughter's boyfriend laconically shrugged his shoulders, said, "I'd eat it." Of course that doesn't mean a lot as he can eat an entire cow by himself.
So a couple nights ago, I tried some "risky ribs." Blasted 'em in the microwave to bone-dropping perfection. The next morning, I woke up, extremely self-satisfied, told my wife, "See? Nothing to worry about. I survived the potential rip melt-down." She replies, "No way am I eating those." Cockily, the hen in the house, I said, "your loss."
Was I ever wrong.
I visited the bathroom many times later. Extremely unpleasant.
I need to trust my wife's olfactory senses. Tell her she was right. As much as it pains me.
I thought "funny" how? I took a whiff. Big, beefy, bouncy & meaty. A little strong, sure, but hey, my olfactory senses aren't the best. Smelled like a dead cow. (Um, probably a little too much).
She says, "I'm not going to eat this." I say, "that's ridiculous, we're not gonna waste the meat." To back up my statement, I corralled a jury composed of my daughter, her boyfriend, my niece and nephew. All took turns sniffing it, one after the other. Consensus was it smelled fine. My daughter's boyfriend laconically shrugged his shoulders, said, "I'd eat it." Of course that doesn't mean a lot as he can eat an entire cow by himself.
So a couple nights ago, I tried some "risky ribs." Blasted 'em in the microwave to bone-dropping perfection. The next morning, I woke up, extremely self-satisfied, told my wife, "See? Nothing to worry about. I survived the potential rip melt-down." She replies, "No way am I eating those." Cockily, the hen in the house, I said, "your loss."
Was I ever wrong.
I visited the bathroom many times later. Extremely unpleasant.
I need to trust my wife's olfactory senses. Tell her she was right. As much as it pains me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)